Follow us

Abstract:

Annually, 8.3 million tonnes of mismanaged plastic waste enter oceans, prompting the food packaging industry, a major contributor, to minimize its environmental footprint. Within the seafood sector, a nascent number of studies are exploring the impacts of various packaging solutions for distribution, yet clear insights remain elusive. This study tries to fill the gap by comparing the impacts of two seafood packaging options: disposable expandable polystyrene (EPS) boxes and, for the first time, reusable plastic crates (RPC) crafted from highdensity polyethylene.

Using the life cycle assessment methodology with a ‘cradle to grave’ approach, the research evaluates the distribution of 1260,000 t of fish from port of Vigo (Spain) to various markets. Similar climate change values emerge in local (5.00⋅107 kg CO2 eq.) and regional trade (1.20⋅108 kg CO2 eq.) for both options, but RPCs exhibit around a 12 % increase (6.15⋅108 kg CO2 eq.) during national distribution, emphasizing package weight and load significance.

The findings across all impact categories exhibited general consistent trends. The sensitivity analysis suggests relocating washing facilities to port could enhance RPCs´environmental benefits for transport within a 160 km range. These findings underscore reusable packaging's potential as an eco-friendlier alternative in specific contexts, aligning with heightened environmental concerns and regulatory pressures surrounding plastic usage.

1 s2.0 S004896972405602X ga1 lrg

Funding:

This work was supported by the EAPA_576/2018NEPTUNUS project. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of Interreg Atlantic Area.

Credit authorship contribution statement:

Sandra Ceballos-Santos: Writing – original draft, Software, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. David Baptista de Sousa: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Investigation, Data curation. Pablo González García: Validation, Investigation, Data curation. Jara Laso: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Conceptualization. María Margallo: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization. Rubén Aldaco: Project administration, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest:

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Related content